Legislature(1999 - 2000)
2000-02-07 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2000-02-07 House Journal Page 2124 HB 105 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 105 "An Act providing for the licensing of speech-language pathologists; and providing for an effective date." 2000-02-07 House Journal Page 2125 HB 105 with the: Journal Page L&C RPT CS(L&C) 2DP 2NR 2004 FISCAL NOTE (DCED) 2005 FIN RPT CS(FIN) NT 1DP 8NR 2084 FISCAL NOTE (DCED) 2084 Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 105(FIN) "An Act providing for the licensing of speech-language pathologists; relating to fees paid by audiologists and speech- language pathologists; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 105(FIN) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 105(FIN) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 105(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 105(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 27 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 6 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Austerman, Barnes, Berkowitz, Brice, Bunde, Cissna, Cowdery, Croft, Davis, Foster, Green, Grussendorf, Halcro, Harris, Hudson, Kapsner, Kemplen, Kerttula, Kott, Moses, Mulder, Murkowski, Porter, Rokeberg, Smalley, Whitaker, Williams Nays: Coghill, Dyson, Kohring, Ogan, Sanders, Therriault Excused: Davies, James, Joule, Kookesh, Morgan, Phillips 2000-02-07 House Journal Page 2126 HB 105 Absent: Masek And so, CSHB 105(FIN) passed the House. Representative Green moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 105(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.